🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.